- Is it the civilians in Idlib province of Syria?
- Is it al Qaeda?
Things just don’t add up. I do believe that this is a pivot point for the narrative of the American Empire .. and as Ian56 @Ian56789 at Twitter says:
So you think PTSD levels among combat Vets & the drug sales as a result of these PTSD levels are off the scale?
Just imagine what will happen when these latest War Crimes & Treason sink in
Prozac, Oxycontin & Heroin dealers licking their lips at extra profit
We have been told many lies since 9/11, and IF you apply simple logic, you can see where this may lead. Maybe the US is protecting the civilians, but why didn’t they in Aleppo last year? Maybe the US is protecting al Qaeda. If so, what does that say about saving the very clan that according to the US government DID 9/11?
NOTE: if you still believe that, you do need to see James Corbett’s 911 A Conspiracy Theory. (video)
However, this would make MANY (a vast majority) people uncomfortable, because it upsets the worldview they have come to accept from one god ( the state) or the other god (their religion).
In my last post about Pearl Harbor, and the lies told in the run up to that “Day that will live in infamy” December 7th, 1941, it took several generations to really unpack and research documents that have shown us the truth of that day, two generations later? What will our kids and grand-kids find in declassified documents in 2070 in regards to 9/11? On the other hand, will we have to wait that long for truth to be unveiled?
So here we are in 2018 seeing the final push by Syria/Russia/Iran and the Hezbollah troops on the ISIS/alQaeda forces, an effort that tests the US foreign policy in the extreme:
.. and the United States (and possibly France, UK and even Germany) are coming on on the side of … al Qaeda!!!
So you might be thinking that al Qaeda is the United States’ main asset to protect in the Middle East.
Not so fast.
Today in 2018 we have seen the Taliban make some impressive gains in Afghanistan .. and the US seems fine with the stalemate, a weak Afghanistan is a well behaved Afghanistan:
What about the 14 year war in Iraq (2004 invasion / Gulf War II)? Iraq as a nation is very week and basically divided and impotent in this region and is not a threat to anyone.
[Originally the rationale for was was for Saddam’s WMDs (Weapons of Mass Desctruction), something the US knew something about since the US gave Saddam Hussein them in 1988 during the Iraq-Iran War]
ISIS (these are NOT religious zealots, they generally don’t read the Koran, they are 90% PLUS mercenaries only 5% are hard core fundamentalists) is seen below expanding to cover much of Iraq and eventually spilling over into Syria:
… were given safe passage of over 500 miles across open desert to Syria:
From 2011-2015 the US was “fighting” ISIS in Syria, they claimed, but it was also noted that the US assisted in training ISIS and other moderate rebels in Jordan to get ready for phase 2 of the ISIS tour in the Middle East. All told, more than 250,000 combatants arrived from overseas to fight against the Syrian Arab Republic:
Not until 2015, when the Russians were invited by Syria’s President Assad to assist in battling ISIS/al Qaeda and other “moderate” rebel groups, did the US hand start to be seen clearly. The US (along with UK/Qatar/SaudiArabia and even Israel) were secret supporters of ISIS/al Qaeda.
Since 2015 is is interesting as much as ISIS/al Qaeda has been pressed, they do not enter Israel (although Israel has been observed aiding ISIS units across the borders in the Middle East).
The US apparently has not been in the Middle East since 1990 and then in Afghanistan (2001), Iraq (2004), and Syria (2011) with a mission to “fight” al Qaeda (50 – 100 members at the time in 2001 when accused of 9/11) , or the Taliban, or ISIS.
Who is there left to PROTECT in the Middle East?
To see who you are protecting, look at the checkbook!
Who else can it be?
Why else would the US even get involved in 1990 with Gulf War I but to keep Iraq from encroaching on Israel (with US military hardware)?
Why else would the US in 2006 birth ISIS in Iraq but to keep Iran from encroaching on Israel?
Why else would the US in 2011 allow safe passage of ISIS into Syria but to keep Iran from encroaching on Israel?
Remember the conditions Trump’s administration was stating not more than a week ago about WHO has to leave Syria first?
The Trump administration won’t consider withdrawing US forces until Iran leaves the country.
Come on now! Russia was invited. Iran was invited. Hezbollah was invited.
The United States was NOT invited. ISIS/alQaeda was NOT invited.
WHO is complaining in the neighborhood?
There is no other way to look at this except that the Zionist nation of Israel needs the US Empire to accomplish the long-distance “defense” of their “homeland”.
So is the following incorrect in its assumptions?
Thoughts? Am I losing my mind here?
Let’s think on this some more.
-SF1